PRJ: MSCHAPv2 to Certificate-Based Authentication Migration

Project Summary

Project

MSCHAPv2 to EAP-TLS/EAP-TEAP Migration

Priority

P1

Status

10% Complete

Total Devices

6,088

Detailed Docs

Principia (legacy)

Business Justification

MSCHAPv2 weaknesses:

  • Vulnerable to offline dictionary attacks

  • NTLM hash can be cracked if captured

  • No mutual authentication by default

  • Credentials exposed during authentication

EAP-TLS/EAP-TEAP benefits:

  • Strongest wireless/wired security

  • Mutual authentication (client + server)

  • No credentials transmitted over the air

  • Revocation capability via CRL/OCSP

  • ise-windows::partials/eaptls-vs-mschapv2-comparison.adoc[EAP-TLS vs MSCHAPv2]

  • Cisco ISE EAP-TLS Configuration Guide

  • Intune Certificate Deployment

  • JAMF PKI Certificates

Sub-Pages

Metadata

Field Value

PRJ ID

PRJ-CHLA-MSCHAPV2-MIGRATION

Author

Evan

Date Created

2026-03-16

Last Updated

2026-03-16

Status

10% Complete

Next Review

2026-04-01