STD-021: Change Advisory Board (CAB) Process
CHLA change management process using iTrack. Every infrastructure change that affects production systems requires a Change record, CAB review, and post-implementation validation.
Applicability
This standard applies to work (CHLA) changes only. Personal/home infrastructure changes follow STD-005 (Change Control) without CAB requirements.
iTrack Change Record
Every change MUST have an iTrack Change record with all required fields populated before implementation begins.
Details Tab — Required Fields
| Field | Guidance |
|---|---|
Summary |
One-line description: what is being changed and why |
Description |
Technical detail — enough for another engineer to understand the change without asking questions |
Requested By |
Person requesting the change (may differ from implementer) |
Manager |
Direct manager of the requester |
Director |
Director in the reporting chain |
Implementer(s) |
All personnel performing configuration changes — list each person and their scope |
Start Date / End Date |
Change window — must be within approved maintenance windows |
Down Time Required? |
Yes/No — if yes, specify duration and affected services |
Affected Users |
Who will experience impact during the change |
Change Plans Tab — Required Fields
| Field | Guidance |
|---|---|
Detailed Implementation Plan |
Step-by-step procedure with verification commands. Reference the CR document (xref to case-studies/changes/) |
Detailed Backout Plan |
How to reverse every change if the implementation fails. Must be tested or validated as feasible |
Detailed Testing Plan |
Pre-CAB testing: what was validated before requesting approval. Post-production testing: what will be validated after implementation |
Detailed Communication Plan |
Who is notified, when, and how (email, Teams, Slack) — before, during, and after |
Risk Analysis/Mitigation Plan |
Risks identified, likelihood, and mitigation strategy |
Benefits Of Change |
Business justification — why this change matters |
Pre-CAB Testing Approval Date(s) |
Date pre-implementation testing was completed |
Pre-CAB Validation By |
Person who validated the testing |
Post-Production Validation Date(s) |
Date post-implementation validation will occur |
Post-Production Validation By |
Person responsible for confirming success |
Change Lifecycle
| State | Description |
|---|---|
Logged |
Change record created, fields populated. Not yet submitted for review. |
Reviewed |
CAB has reviewed the change. Questions addressed, schedule confirmed. |
Approved |
CAB approved implementation. Change window is authorized. |
Implemented |
Change executed during the approved window. Post-validation in progress. |
Closed |
Post-implementation validation complete. Change record finalized. |
Cancelled |
Change withdrawn before implementation. |
Failed |
Backout executed. Requires incident report (STD-011) if service impacted. |
Personnel Roles
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
Requester |
Identifies the need, creates the iTrack record, provides business justification |
Implementer(s) |
Execute the technical change during the approved window. Multiple implementers are common (e.g., network engineer + NAC engineer) |
Tester / Validator |
Verifies the change works as expected — independent from implementers where possible |
CAB Reviewer |
Reviews the change plan for completeness, risk, and scheduling conflicts |
Scheduling
-
Standard changes: Submit 5+ business days before the change window
-
Emergency changes: CAB chair approval required — document retroactively within 24 hours
-
Freeze periods: No non-critical changes during declared freezes (e.g., mobile release cuts, quarter-end)
-
Change windows: Coordinate with the CHLA change calendar to avoid conflicts
Cross-Reference
-
STD-005 (Change Control) — the verify-change-verify pattern applies to every command within a CAB-approved change
-
STD-011 (Incident Response) — failed changes that impact service trigger incident workflow
-
STD-013 (Case Studies Taxonomy) — CR- documents in domus-captures provide the detailed implementation plan